Login|Free Signup
All Comments to Brad Kugler Photography's Photos

 DavidziffUnited States wrote: Monday, April 7, 2008 - 9:31 AM
IMG 8856   2008-03-23

When you get U-point you can add back in the sky!!!!

 DavidziffUnited States wrote: Monday, April 7, 2008 - 9:29 AM
IMG 8843   2008-03-23

looks slightly overexposed or under-saturated. You could check it in Aperture with the hot and cold area control and let me know.

 DavidziffUnited States wrote: Monday, April 7, 2008 - 9:28 AM
IMG 8837   2008-03-23

Do you use "high and cold area" in the view drop down of Aperture? I find it invaluable in locating 255 and plus highlight zones and 0 zones of the dynamic range - in other words blown out highlights or clipped blacks. I then use first recovery to handle the blown out highlights and highlight control if still needed) and the black point and shadows adjustment as needed.

 DavidziffUnited States wrote: Monday, April 7, 2008 - 8:33 AM
BKP 9140   2008-03-23

bullseye on the baby's expression and the toy dog is a great touch.

 DavidziffUnited States wrote: Monday, April 7, 2008 - 8:31 AM
BKP 9137   2008-03-23

Well, this is what makes baby photography so tough - they don't always cooperate

 DavidziffUnited States wrote: Monday, April 7, 2008 - 8:30 AM
IMG 8820   2008-03-23

terrific! Great idea well executed.

 DavidziffUnited States wrote: Monday, April 7, 2008 - 8:28 AM
BKP 9133   2008-03-23

Who is MichelleAnne and the provocative photo? (I love the skin tones and expressions on this great photo!!!)

 DavidziffUnited States wrote: Monday, April 7, 2008 - 8:27 AM
BKP 9128   2008-03-23

The prospective of this photo bothers me a bit as it emphasizes the baby's baldness which alarmed me a bit in terms of whether she's healthy or not.

#####
she is healthy but point taken.

 DavidziffUnited States wrote: Monday, April 7, 2008 - 8:25 AM
BKP 9123   2008-03-23

Perhaps the dynamic range could have been improved (and make the photo more pleasing) by using the shadows adjustment to open up the background shadows.

 DavidziffUnited States wrote: Monday, April 7, 2008 - 8:24 AM
BKP 9121   2008-03-23

Do you think you could have opened up the background a bit? The shadows adjustment would have done the trick. It's a case of inadequate dynamic range as the background has begun to be blotchy and distracting.

 DavidziffUnited States wrote: Monday, April 7, 2008 - 8:20 AM
BKP 9119   2008-03-23

I love the sharpness of this photo

 DavidziffUnited States wrote: Monday, April 7, 2008 - 8:19 AM
IMG 8809   2008-03-23

Is the foreground out of focus? Not sure why the bags seem blurry (?)

 DavidziffUnited States wrote: Monday, April 7, 2008 - 8:17 AM
IMG 8805   2008-03-23

Very nice - were you on a ladder or did you climb a tree? :-)

#######
hand held above my head.

 DavidziffUnited States wrote: Monday, April 7, 2008 - 8:16 AM
IMG 8803   2008-03-23

I wonder about the composition of the high-cropped out father and daughter (?) on the left

 DavidziffUnited States wrote: Monday, April 7, 2008 - 8:14 AM
BKP 9106   2008-03-23

Technically great shot and wonderful use of flash, however from the viewpoint of quality of comm the expression of the baby isn't pleasing of course; not particularly what the parents would prefer to see.
######
YES!

 DavidziffUnited States wrote: Monday, April 7, 2008 - 8:13 AM
IMG 8800   2008-03-23

Might have been better if black-clad leg cropped out on the right
#####
good point, didn't even notice it.

 Davey's PhotosUnited States wrote: Wednesday, April 2, 2008 - 8:11 AM
BKP 9154   2008-03-23

Awesome picture in B&W

Guest David Ziff wrote: Wednesday, April 2, 2008 - 7:27 AM
IMG_9164 _ 2008-04-01.jpg

Very nice - how was this obtained?

Guest david Ziff wrote: Wednesday, April 2, 2008 - 7:25 AM
IMG_9057 _ 2008-04-01.jpg

Seems like perfect exposure. Do you have a diffuser or a reflector screen here?

Guest david Ziff wrote: Wednesday, April 2, 2008 - 7:22 AM
BKP_9301 _ 2008-04-01.jpg

This one seems overexposed compared to the one before